Legal Opinion

Levine v. Hauser

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 15, 1988No. C3-88-2083PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

FACTS

Respondent Hauser operates two grocery stores. A dispute arose with appellant landlord as to the precise amount owed by Hauser for real estate taxes. Appellant brought two unlawful detainer actions. By order on May 13, 1988 the trial court specified the amounts due and indicated that writs of restitution would issue if the amounts were not paid within 20 days. The specified amounts were timely paid and no judgments of restitution were entered.

Appellant claims the trial court miscalculated the amounts due. Appellant’s motion for amended findings…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kempf v. KempfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Rieman v. JoubertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Makela v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Duluth Ready-Mix Concrete, Inc. v. City of DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  2. In Re the Establishment of County Ditch No. 11 (Bevens Creek)Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  4. First Minnesota Bank v. Overby Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  5. TRI-STATE INS. CO. OF MINN. v. BontjesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API