Marriage of Mingen v. Mingen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Justice.
In this case, we consider whether the expiration of the 60-day period to appeal from entry of judgment under Minn. R. Civ.App. P. 104.01, subd. 1, may be revived and extended by a subsequent post-decision motion under Minn. R. Civ.App. P. 104.01, subd. 2, to amend the order that directed entry of judgment. The court of appeals dismissed the appeal as untimely because appellant’s post-decision motion, filed after expiration of the time for appeal from the judgment, was untimely and therefore did not extend the appeal period. We affirm.
The marriage of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Barrett v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- House v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Marzitelli v. City of Little CanadaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Tombs v. AshworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Tompkins v. SandeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- SHAMROCK DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- In re Welfare of the Child of R.K.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Cox v. Mid-Minnesota Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- TC/American Monorail, Inc. v. Custom Conveyor Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.