Legal Opinion
United States Leasing Corp. v. Biba Information Processing Services, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 18, 1992No. C9-91-1191PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
On petition of defendants Biba Information Processing Services, Inc. and Roger Haro, 1 we review only that portion of a split and unpublished decision of the court of appeals reversing the trial court’s determination that petitioners’ alternative post-trial motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial were not timely. We reverse.
Minn.R.Civ.P. 59.03, defining the time for service and hearing of a motion for a new trial, 2 provides as follows:
A notice of motion for a new trial shall be served within 15 days after a general verdict or service of notice by a party of the filing…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rieman v. JoubertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Woodrow v. ToblerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marriage of Rubey v. VannettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- American Standard Insurance Co. v. LeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- American Standard Insurance Co. v. Dang Van LeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Celis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Celis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998