Legal Opinion
In Re the Establishment of County Ditch No. 11 (Bevens Creek)
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 25, 1994No. C0-93-1911PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
ANDERSON, Chief Judge.
FACTS
On January 26, 1993, respondent Carver County Board of Commissioners (board), as drainage authority, dismissed appellant landowners’ (landowners) petition to establish a drainage system. See Minn.Stat. § 103E.005, subds. 9, 4 (1992) (a county board may serve as a drainage authority). The board ordered landowners to reimburse the board $81,222.35 for “costs and expenses” it incurred on landowners’ behalf during the proceeding, including $32,941.02 in interest. In their appeal to the district court, landowners contested the issue of reimbursement,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Bongard v. BongardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- Rieman v. JoubertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Levine v. HauserCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Duluth Ready-Mix Concrete, Inc. v. City of DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Garcia v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Anderson v. County of StearnsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Matsch v. Prairie Island Indian CommunityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Pestka v. County of Blue EarthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.