Legal Opinion

Barron v. Hennepin County

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 21, 1992No. C1-91-2013PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

Certiorari on the relation of Hennepin County to review an order of the Minnesota Tax Court reversing the county assessor’s denial of the application of respondents Stephen and Charlene Barron for tax valuation under the Minnesota agricultural property tax law, Minn.Stat. § 273.111, more commonly known as the green acres statute. We reverse.

The Barrons are the owners of approximately 20 acres of open land located in Medina, Minnesota. The property was purchased for $160,000 and was originally part of a horse farm that had been divided and sold as lots of 5 to 20 acres in size.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Elwell v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Rieman v. JoubertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Summit House Apartment Co. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Reiss Greenhouses, Inc. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. STRIB IV, LLC fka Richard T. Burke I, LLC, Relator v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  2. Ruberto v. County of WashingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Raisanen v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. McLean v. County of DakotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Schmieg v. County of ChisagoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API