Legal Opinion

Stitz v. Ryan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 3, 1934No. 29,913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, Justice.

Plaintiffs appeal from the order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

The essential facts alleged in the complaint may be thus stated: Plaintiffs are the minor daughters of Leonard Stitz, who lost his life on May 2, 1927, in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment by William J. Coleman. Compensation Avas awarded by the industrial commission to his Avidow and plaintiffs, his dependents. His widow remarried, and on June 17, 1931, the industrial commission fixed the compensation to plaintiffs at $13.20 weekly during their dependency. Such payments were made…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Anseth v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. American Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hunt v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. Ebert v. WhitneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Minneapolis Trust Co. v. BirkholzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yoselowitz v. Peoples Bakery, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Brix v. General Accident & Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. In Re Estate of BorlaugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Lucero v. Northrip Logging Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API