Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Anseth v. District Court

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 1916No. Nos. 19,920—(258)PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Upon the relation of Julius Anseth this court granted its writ of certiorari to review the action of the district court for Koochiching county, McClenahan, J., in proceedings under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by John B. Tubbs, employee, against Julius Anseth, employer.

1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.

Proceedings under the Workmen’s Compensation Act to recover compensation for injuries received by John B. Tubbs, in the course of his employment by Julius Anseth, as bartender in a saloon in the city of International Falls, Koochiching county. The trial court awarded compensation in the sum of $1,000 to be paid in a lump sum, and $150 for medical services. The case comes to this court on a writ of certiorari.

The first question is whether the accident to Tubbs arose out of his employment. The findings of the trial court which are amply supported by the evidence, show the facts to be as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Peoples Coal & Ice Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Johansen v. Union Stock Yards Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Pierce v. Boyer-Van Kuran Lumber & Coal Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Bailey v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Lynch v. BrennanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Woodward Iron Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Boek v. Wong HingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Jacquemin v. Turner & Seymour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
  5. Hale v. Savage Fire Brick Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API