Legal Opinion

American Fuel Co. v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1920No. 3432PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Proceedings for compensation by Theras Lappas, employe, opposed by the American Fuel Company of Utah, employer. Award for claimant, and the employer petitions for a writ of certiorari directed to the Industrial Commission of Utah.

1Opinion of the CourtWeber, J.

Plaintiff, a corporation under the laws of Utah, procured the issuance by this court of a writ of certiorari directed to defendants. In its petition plaintiff, inter alia, alleges that on April '21, 1919, Theras Lappas filed an application with the Industrial Commission praying for compensation for personal injuries suffered by accident arising out of and in the course of the employment of said applicant by the American Fuel Company, the plaintiff; that on the 26th of September, 1919, a formal hearing was had before the Industrial Commission when the plaintiff appeared and presented evidence…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Park Utah Consolidated Mines Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Chez, Atty. Gen. v. Industrial Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Fay v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Gaylen Christensen and Mary Christensen, Husband and Wife, and Workers Compensation Fund of Utah v. Oshkosh Truck Corporation, a Wisconsin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. Thomas A. Paulsen Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API