Wasserburger v. American Scientific Chemical, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.
This is an action on an oral contract to recover allegedly unpaid sales commissions. The case was tried before the court, without a jury. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant. We affirm.
One of plaintiff’s two assignments of error is that:
“The trial court erred in holding that plaintiff’s right to commissions under the contract ceased the moment plaintiff discussed with United the possibility of United buying their medical laboratory supplies from a different supplier.”
This attempted assignment of error clearly fails to conform to the requirements of Rule 2.35 of our Rules of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Prime v. PrimeOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Perkins v. Standard Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Turner v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Mohr v. LearOregon Supreme Court · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Sun Studs, Inc. v. Ata Equipment Leasing, Inc., Applied Theory, Inc. And U.S. Natural Resources, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Pereira v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Iron Horse Engineering Co. v. Northwest Rubber Extruders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Pollock v. DR Horton, Inc.-PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Venture Properties, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.