Legal Opinion

Mohr v. Lear

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1964PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants, six in number, from a decree of the circuit court which canceled a contract and awarded restitution in the amount of $21,421 to the plaintiffs. The latter are Mr. and Mrs. William Mohr. The defendants are three couples whose family names are Lear, Ranger and Russom.

The defendants present these five assignments of error:

“The trial court erred in holding that the plaintiffs were not in default under the terms of their contract with the defendants.”
“The trial court erred in holding that the defendants had repudiated their contract with the plaintiffs.”
“The…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. ViglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Dingley v. OlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Mobley v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Cornely v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Swick v. MUELLER ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Blinzler v. AndrewsIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Transnational Insurance Company v. RosenlundDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1966
  3. Wasserburger v. American Scientific Chemical, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. City of Portland Ex Rel. Donohue & Fleskes Corp. v. Hoffman Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Soltis v. LilesOregon Supreme Court · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API