Legal Opinion

Prime v. Prime

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1943PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

Under the pleadings we must determine whether the so-called property'settlement above set forth, when approved by the order of the court in a divorce case, is an enforceable claim .against the estate of Glenn E. Prime, deceased. It is undisputed that all installments were paid until the death of Glenn E. Prime. The only question relates to the validity of the installments accrued and accruing subsequent to the date of his death.

In seeking a solution, we must attempt, with due regard for authority, to harmonize two conflicting-principles of law, both valid in their own proper setting. The…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Wilson v. . HinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Storey v. StoreyIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Herrick v. HerrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Mansfield v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Kirkbride v. Van NoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Briggs v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Matter of Marriage of McDonnalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Feves v. FevesOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Matter of Marriage of MullinaxOregon Supreme Court · 1982

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API