Legal Opinion
Iron Horse Engineering Co. v. Northwest Rubber Extruders, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 12, 2004No. 0002-01794; A115936PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*404WOLLHEIM, J.
This action arises out of a contract involving “rail boot” for the Portland Streetcar Project (the project). “Rail boot” is a rubber cover that is placed around streetcar rail tracks that are embedded in pavement. Appellant Northwest Rubber Extruders, Inc. (Northwest) is a rubber and plastic company that manufactures rail boot through a process called “extrusion.” Respondent Iron Horse Engineering Co., Inc. (Iron Horse) develops designs for rail boot. In this case, Iron Horse and Northwest agreed to work together to provide rail boot for the project but negotiations failed and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Uptown Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Seafirst Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Perkins v. Standard Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Curtis v. MRI IMAGING SERVICES IIOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Building Structures, Inc. v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Wasserburger v. American Scientific Chemical, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Klamath Off-Project Water Users, Inc. v. PacifiCorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Arnett v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Hamlin v. Hampton Lumber Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Najjar v. Safeway, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Golik v. CBS Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.