Capalbo v. Planning & Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The principal issue in this case is whether General Statutes § 8-21 authorizes a municipality to enact a zoning regulation limiting the number of colors that may be contained in an outdoor advertising sign. The plaintiffs, Frank M. and Caroline Capalbo, appealed to the Superior Court from a decision of the named defendant, the planning and zoning board of appeals of the town of Greenwich (board), denying the plaintiffs a permit to erect their sign. The trial court consolidated this administrative appeal with *482the plaintiffs’ separate action against the defendant Jerry Landsfeld, the Greenwich…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Mahoney v. LensinkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Spero v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. GrullonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Double I Ltd. Partnership v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Norman v. BucklewMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.