Legal Opinion
Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 1, 2009No. AC 29854PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
In this summary process action involving a mobile manufactured home site, the defendants, Nancy Dickal, Alan Dickal and Lisa Dickal, appeal from the trial court’s judgment of possession in favor of the plaintiff, Fairchild Heights, Inc. The defendants claim that the court improperly: (1) found that certain rules and regulations concerning motor vehicle parking were applied in a manner fair to all of the mobile home park residents; (2) concluded that the defendants failed to establish a presumption of retaliatory eviction pursuant to General Statutes § 21-80a and that they…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fellows v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Stevenson Lumber Company-Suffield, Inc. v. Chase Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Dairy Mart, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Visco v. CodyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Emigrant Mortg., Co., Inc. v. D'AgostinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. DickalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Presidential Village, LLC v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Housing Authority v. StevensConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. DickalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Boccanfuso v. DaghoghiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020