Legal Opinion
Visco v. Cody
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 27, 1988No. 6215PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The defendants appeal from the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff in this summary process action. The sole issue presented is one of first impression: Whether the trial court erred in finding that the defendants’ good faith requests for repairs did not successfully invoke the provisions of General Statutes § 47a-20 because the requested repairs were minor in nature. We find no error.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. In October, 1976, the plaintiff purchased an apartment building located at 149 Barbour Street in Hartford. The defendants, Clifford Cody and Elsie Cody, were tenants…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dukes v. DuranteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Muha v. United Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Doe v. Institute of Living, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Lena Robinson v. Diamond Housing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wilson v. JeffersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Welsch v. GroatConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Housing Authority v. OlesenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Renaissance Management Co. v. BarnesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- State v. GuadalupeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.