Legal Opinion
Sherman v. Physical Therapists Examining Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 31, 1965No. 3629PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Judge:
Here for review is a decision of the Physical Therapists Examining Board of the District of Columbia, denying an application for registration without examination.
The application had been made under the provisions of the statute which requires that:
“The Commissioners shall register as a physical therapist, without examination, any physical therapist who is at least twenty years of age and of good moral character and who presents evidence satisfactory to the Commissioners that she was, prior to the effective date of this subchapter, practicing physical therapy in the District of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Watson v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hicks v. Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Schramm v. Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Brewster v. KinleinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
- Hansen v. Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- Olsen v. District of Columbia Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967