Legal Opinion

Watson v. Maryland

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 31, 1910No. 174PublishedCited by 227 opinions

ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. The facts, which involve the constitutionality of the statute of Maryland relative to registration of medical practitioners in that State, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the Circuit Court of Allegany County, Maryland, for a violation of § 99 of article 43 of the Maryland Code of 1904, for the offense of practicing medicine in the State of Maryland without being registered in accordance with the provisions of §§ 83 and 89 of the same article. The Maryland act in question, requiring registration of physicians, provides a comprehensive system for the regulation of the practice of medicine and surgery, and, concerning the necessity of registration, enacts (Art. 43, § 83):

“All persons, except physicians who were practicing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Williams v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Watson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907

3Cited by227 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Pinnick v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  5. United States v. Maryland Savings-Share Ins. Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

222 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API