Hansen v. Physical Therapists Examining Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Chief Judge:
This is an appeal from an order of the Physical Therapists Examining Board of the District of Columbia denying petitioner registration without examination under the “grandfather clause” of the Act creating the Board.1 In order to qualify for such registration it was incumbent on petitioner to show that he had practiced physical therapy in the District of Columbia for a period of two years immediately preceding the effective date of the Act and that he had either graduated from an approved school of physical therapy or had received comparable training or experience in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hicks v. Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Schramm v. Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Sherman v. Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
- Hlebanja v. Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Olsen v. District of Columbia Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hansen v. ThalleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Hansen v. Virginia State Board of MedicineRichmond County Circuit Court · 1974