Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL PROM THE UNITED STATES COMMERCE COURT. The facts, which involve the construction of the Act to. Regulate Commerce in regard to the provisions of the Hepburn Act for fixing rates, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lamak
The New Orleans Board of Trade, in October and November, 1907, brought three separate proceedings against *90the Louisville & Nashville Railroad, asking the Commerce Commission to set aside as unfair, unreasonable and discriminatory certain class and commodity rates (local) from New Orleans to (1) Mobile, to (2) Pensacola, and (3) through rates, via those cities, to Montgomery, Selma, and Prattville. The Railroad answered. A hearing was had, the issue as to commodity rates was adjusted by agreement, and on December 31,1909, the Commission made a single order in which it found the class rates…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Chin Yow v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Low Wah Suey v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by477 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
472 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.