Legal Opinion
Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RR
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 20, 1913No. 600PublishedCited by 357 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
227 U.S. 88 (1913)
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
v.
LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY.
No. 600.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 17, 18, 1912.
Decided January 20, 1913.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COMMERCE COURT.
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Fowler and Mr. P.J. Farrell, with whom Mr. Blackburn Esterline, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, was on the brief, for appellants.
Mr. Helm Bruce, with whom Mr. Henry L. Stone and Mr. Albert S. Brandeis were on the brief, for appellee.
2Opinion of the Court · LamarJustice Lamar
The New Orleans Board of Trade, in October and November, 1907, brought three separate…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Chin Yow v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Low Wah Suey v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by357 opinions
- Willapoint Oysters, Inc. v. EwingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Silberschein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Hoover Motor Exp. Co. v. Railroad & Public Utilities CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
- In the Matter of Leslie BOOMGARDEN, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Perkins v. Endicott Johnson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
352 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.