Legal Opinion
Schramm v. Physical Therapists Examining Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 1, 1966No. 3391PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
Petitioner seeks review of respondent’s denial of her application for registration as a physical therapist without examination pursuant to Code 1961, § 2-458 (Supp. V, 1966). This statute requires the Examining Board to register without examination an applicant who
“ * * * presents evidence satisfactory to the Commissioners that she was * * * practicing physical therapy in the District of Columbia for a period of two years immediately preceding the effective date of this subchapter, and that she (1) has graduated from an approved school of physical therapy listed in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Corbett v. KinleinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- Sherman v. Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
3Cited by6 opinions
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency and Russell E. Train, Administrator, Velsicol Chemical Corporation and Pineapple Growers Association of Hawaii, Intervenors. Earl L. Butz, Secretary of Agriculture of the United States v. Russell E. Train, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, Velsicol Chemical Corporation, Intervenor. Velsicol Chemical Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency, Russell E. Train, Administrator, Velsicol Chemical Corporation v. Russell E. Train, Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Hlebanja v. Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Hansen v. Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- Carbon v. Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.