Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Physical Therapists Examining Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 14, 1966No. 3390PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Chief Judge.
Petitioner sought registration as a physical therapist without taking and passing the required examination. Under the statute allowing such registration an applicant must present satisfactory evidence of (1) practicing physical therapy in the District of Columbia for the period of two years immediately preceding the effective date of the statute and (2) graduation from an approved School of Physical Therapy or (3) comparable training or experience in the practice of physical therapy as determined by the Commissioners. 1 Petitioner did not rely upon the approved education…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bernstein v. Real Estate CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Corbett v. KinleinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- Sherman v. Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
3Cited by8 opinions
- LCP, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Roberts v. District of Columbia Board of MedicineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Hansen v. Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- Carbon v. Physical Therapists Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
- Leona E. Schramm v. Physical Therapists Examining Board for the District of Columbia, Cecilia M. Hlebanja v. Physical Therapists Examining Board for the District of Columbia, Robert Waverly Hicks v. Physical Therapists Examining Board for the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.