Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Lane
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 7, 2002No. Misc. AG No. 52, Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CATHELL, Judge.
On January 17, 2001, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, petitioner, by Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel, and Glenn M. Grossman, Deputy Bar Counsel, filed a Petition for Disciplinary Action against Samuel Joseph Lane, respondent. The petition alleged that respondent, based on his representation of Lance D. Williams and Cheryl Lynn Bair, had violated Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC) 1.1, 1.2(a), 1.3, 1.4, 1.5(c), and 8.4(a), (c), and (d). 1 This Court, by Order dated January 18, 2001, transmitted the action to the Circuit Court for Washington County for that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. OwrutskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.