Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Garland

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 16, 1997No. Misc. (Subtitle BV) No. 5, Sept. Term, 1995PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

The Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, filed a petition for disciplinary action against Thomas A. Garland, Respondent, for violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct. The petition alleged that Respondent violated Rules 8.4(b) and 8.4(d). 1 Bar counsel recommends an indefinite suspension.

Pursuant to Maryland Rule BV9(b), 2 we referred the matter to Judge Clayton Greene, Jr. of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. Following an evidentiary hearing, Judge Greene found that Respondent had violated Rules…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoldsboroughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BreschiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API