Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Blum

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 10, 2003No. Misc. Docket AG, No. 11, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATTAGLIA, Judge.

Respondent Bruce David Blum (hereinafter “Blum”) was admitted to the Bar of this Court on December 15, 1988, and thereafter, to the Bar of the District of Columbia. On March 21, 2002, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (hereinafter “Bar Counsel”), acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-709(a), 1 filed a petition for disciplinary action against Blum charging him with violating the following Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (hereinafter “MRPC”): MRPC 1.15(a)(Safekeeping property), 2 MRPC 1.16(d)(Declining or Terminating Representation), 3 MRPC 3.3(a)(1) and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. Cherry-MahoiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API