Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Reinhardt

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 10, 2006No. Misc. Docket AG No. 1, September Term, 2005PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRaker, J.

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland filed a petition with this Court for disciplinary action against Richard J. Reinhardt, alleging violations of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct.1 The Commission charged respondent with violating Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct: (1) Rule 1.1 Competence, (2) Rule 1.2 Scope of Representation, (3) Rule 1.3 Diligence, (4) Rule 1.4 Communication, (5) Rule 3.2 Expediting Litigation, and (6) Rule 8.4 Misconduct. Pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-752(a), we referred the matter to Judge Ruth Jakubowski of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BoluskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BleeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SiskindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. UgwuonyeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API