Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Hewlett

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1951No. Civ. 14713PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Amanda McDonald, as the administratrix of the estates of Agnes, August, Fred and George Kromrey, brought this action against George Hewlett, an attorney at law, to recover some $50,000 of money and personal property alleged to belong to the Kromrey estates, possession of which, it is alleged, was secured by Hewlett from George Kromrey by fraud and deceit and in violation of the confidential rela tionship existing between the two. Hewlett’s basic defense to the action was that the money and property had been received from George Kromrey as a gift. He also cross-complained and counterclaimed,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Carlson v. LantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Miller v. McLaglenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. People v. MahoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Dinneen v. YoungerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Stormon v. WeissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  2. In Re Swan's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Bradner. v. VasquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Schlichting v. SchlichtingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Estate of GeloneseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API