Legal Opinion

Dinneen v. Younger

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1943No. Civ. 12250PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiff, Rickard B. Dinneen, brought this action to quiet his title to a parcel of improved real property located in the city of Santa Cruz. One of the defendants, the administrator of the estate of Rose B. Dinneen, deceased wife of plaintiff cross-complained and asked that his title as administrator be quieted. From a judgment quieting the administrator’s title plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

Plaintiff claims title to the property, known as the Church Street property, by virtue of a deed of gift from Ms wife alleged to have been duly executed and delivered to him on July 14, 1932.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Bury v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Decou v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Cox v. SchnerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Whitlow v. DurstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Huth v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Crenshaw v. CrenshawIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Rich v. ErvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. McNabb v. BrewsterIdaho Supreme Court · 1954

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API