Legal Opinion

Berry v. Chaplin

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1946No. Civ. 15135PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

This is a filiation proceeding commenced under sections 196a and 231 of the Civil Code by the grandmother of plaintiff as guardian ad litem prior to plaintiff’s birth in which a judgment was prayed that defendant be declared to be the father of plaintiff, and that he be required to pay for medical care during pregnancy and birth for the mother of plaintiff, and for the support of plaintiff after birth, together with attorneys’ fees and costs.

Following the commencement of the action a stipulation . was signed by the guardian ad litem and the attorneys then representing her and plaintiff, and…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. In re the Estate of JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Dionisio v. Dacanay and Reynaldo C. Dacanay, by His Father and Next Friend v. Saturnina Mendoza, Victor P. Mendoza, and Doe Insurance Co. No. 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. State v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API