Legal Opinion

Mills Alloys, Inc. v. Stoody Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 24, 1938No. 8313PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This is a patent infringement suit brought by the owner of letters patent 1,-803,875 to enjoin the use of the process therein described for surfacing the face of an oil well drill. The matter was referred to a special master over the objections of the appellants. The master found the patent claims involved to be valid and infringed. Exceptions were taken to the master’s report, and overruled. The master’s findings were sustained and adopted by the court, and an interlocutory injunction granted and an accounting ordered. From this interlocutory decree this appeal is taken.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stoody Co. v. Mills Alloys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  2. Reinharts, Inc. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  3. Anraku v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  4. Vapor Car Heating Co. v. Gold Car Heating & Lighting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  5. Stewart-Warner Corporation v. Jiffy Lubricator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stoody Co. v. Osage Metal Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  2. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  3. Larson v. General Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  4. Stoody Co. v. Carleton Metals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  5. Haynes Stellite Co. v. Stoody Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API