Legal Opinion
Stoody Co. v. Carleton Metals, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 8, 1940No. 9150PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
These appeals are from decrees dismissing the bills of complaint in two patent infringement suits (Nos. 800-Y and 801-Y) in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California.
Both suits were brought by appellant, Stoody Company. One (No. 800-Y) was against Carlton Metals, Incorporated, and A. J. Carlton. One (No. 801-Y) was against Enterprise Foundry Corporation, Mike Mikels and H. A. D. Mikels. Enterprise Foundry Corporation consented that *921a decree be entered against it, and such a •decree was entered. That corporation was not a party to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Triplett v. LowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Mills Alloys, Inc. v. Stoody Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Haynes Stellite Co. v. Stoody Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lehman Co. of America, Inc. v. Appleton Toy & Furniture Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Ostby & Barton Co. v. JungersenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
- Pressley v. BrownDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1990
- Washington v. SterlingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- Stoody Co. v. MikelsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941