Legal Opinion
Stoody Co. v. Mills Alloys, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 4, 1933No. 7059PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
This suit was brought by the appellant for the alleged infringement by the appellees of the appellant’s United States letters patent No. 1,757,601, issued May 6,1930, and covering a welding rod used for applying welding on facing for well drilling tools and the like, which are subject to extreme abrasion.
The welding rod in its preferred form consists of a mild steel tube of suitable length, closed at both ends, and filled with pieces of tungsten carbide. In use, the steel of the tube is melted by the heat of an acetylene torch, and is fused to the steel of the bit. The…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- France Mfg. Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Research Products Co. v. Tretolite Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.