Legal Opinion

Reinharts, Inc. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 8, 1936No. 7636PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from a decree which held that five patents owned by appellee were, as to the claims in suit, valid and infringed by appellant, enjoined appellant from further infringing them, and referred the case to a master for an accounting and for the assessment of damages.

The patents in question are Turnbull, No. 1,304,416; Holt, No. 1,314,651; Wickersham, No. 1,356,679; Whitacre, No. 1,-744,516; and Norelius, No. 1,317,653. The Turnbull, Holt, Wickersham, and Whitacre patents are for improvements in tractors. The Norelius patent is for an improvement in trailer…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  2. Hanovia Chemical & Mfg. Co. v. David Buttrick Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942
  3. Ralph N. Brodie Co. v. Hydraulic Press Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  4. Wire Tie MacH. Co. v. Pacific Box CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  5. Stuart Oxygen Co. v. JosephianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API