Haynes Stellite Co. v. Stoody Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
This case was argued and submitted with Mills Alloys, Inc., et al. v. Stoody Company, 9 Cir., 94 F.2d 413, this day decided, to which we will hereinafter refer as the companion case. Both cases involve the validity of patent 1,803,875, issued to W. F. Stoody et al., for a method of facing tools, and for the resulting product. Both cases arose in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California and were pending there at the same time. In the companion case, the .special master, to whom the case had been referred, held that the patent was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stoody Co. v. Mills Alloys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Mills Alloys, Inc. v. Stoody Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stoody Co. v. Osage Metal Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Stoody Co. v. Carleton Metals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Owens v. American Stereographic Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Stoody Co. v. Carlton Metals, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1938