Boye v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
In the above-captioned action, plaintiffs allege that they have not been paid the wages and benefits to which they are entitled pursuant to various self-determination contracts executed by their employer, the Navajo Nation, and the United States Department of the Interior (“Department of the Interior”). They bring their claim as purported third-party beneficiaries. Defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted pursuant to Rule 12 of the Rules of the United States Court…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Demodulation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Vandesande v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Threshold Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Ground Improvement Techniques, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.