Legal Opinion

Ground Improvement Techniques, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 5, 2012No. 12-57 CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RCFC 17(a); Real Party in Interest for Claims Transferred to Creditors in Bankruptcy Case; No Privity of Contract Between the United States and Subcontractor of Prime Contractor.

OPINION AND ORDER

Bush, Judge.

On April 3, 2012, the government filed Defendant’s Motion to Identify/Join the Real Parties in Interest and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Ground Improvement Techniques. The court has before it defendant’s motion (Def.’s Mot.), plaintiffs’ response (Pis.’ Opp.), and defendant’s reply (Def.’s Reply). The “real parties in interest” motion primarily concerns a threshold matter, whether this suit…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ground Improvement Techniques, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  2. Edna N. Zulueta v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. Urs Energy & Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API