Legal Opinion
Vandesande v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 18, 2010No. 09-258CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER & OPINION
DAMICH, Judge.
In this breach of contract action against the United States, Plaintiff Gladys S. Vande-sande alleges that her former employer, the United States Postal Service (“the USPS” or “the Service”), violated the terms of a Stipulation Agreement Regarding Damages (“Stipulation Agreement” or “the Agreement”) that the parties reached in settlement of a Title VII claim of discrimination on the basis of pregnancy. Ms. Vandesande had entered into the Agreement following an initial determination of USPS liability by an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) of the United States Equal…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Vandesande v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Fillmore Equipment of Holland, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Coleman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Goudelock v. McLemoreDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2013
- Kettle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.