Legal Opinion
Demodulation, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 29, 2012No. 11-236CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
BRADEN, Judge.
I. RELEVANT FACTS.1
Plaintiff Demodulation, Inc. (“Demodulation” or “Plaintiff’) has developed patented and proprietary technology, intellectual property, and other trade secrets that can detect mierowire from at least a distance of twenty miles. Am. Compl. ¶¶ 2, 17. Mierowire has “sensing capabilities” that can “harvest energy from the ambient electromagnetic conditions in the atmosphere and ... render objects invisible to radar.” Am. Compl. ¶ 18. Mierowire also can be engineered to transmit digital information.…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hitkansut LLC, a Michigan Corporation, & Acceledyne Technologies, Ltd., LLC, a Michigan Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Liberty Ammunition, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Keehn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Parker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Tektel, Incorporated v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.