Legal Opinion
Beaver City v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1926No. 4338PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.
This is a review of a record of the Industrial Commission. The principal question is whether the injury arose out of or in the course of the employment of the injured. The commission held that it did, and made an award.
The employe was city marshal of Beaver City. He was regularly on duty from about 8:30 a. m. until about 11 p. m., sometimes, as occasion required, until after midnight, and was subject to call at all hours of the day and night. The commission found that, while the marshal was driving cattle out of the park, and in his jumping a ditch, his revolver fell out of his pocket and in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Claim of De Voe v. New York State RailwaysNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Lake v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Cudahy Packing Co. of Nebraska v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- Claim of Scanlon v. Herald Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Behr v. SothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- State v. De MeoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Mashburn v. City of GrandfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Logue v. Independent School District No. 33Idaho Supreme Court · 1933
- Greer v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.