Legal Opinion

Derleth v. Roach & Seeber Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1924No. Docket No. 64PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Defendant Roach & Seeber Company is a corporation engaged in the wholesale grocery and produce business and operates a branch at Marquette. George Derleth, husband of plaintiff Emma H. Derleth, and son of plaintiff Mary Derleth, was in its employ at the Marquette branch. A portion of each week he worked as a traveling salesman, and the balance of the time he worked in the office. His salary was $175 per month, and he received a bonus which brought it up to $245 on an average. In the usual course he made Ishpeming Monday, Negaunee Tuesday, and after that he made what was called the country…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Reck v. WhittlesbergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Clifton v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Punches v. American Box Board Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Claim of Kingsley v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hildebrand v. . Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Continental Life Insurance v. GoughSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  3. Speas v. Boone CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Rector v. Ragnar-Benson, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Perry v. Johnson Fruit Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1932

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API