Mullin v. Rousseau
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Action for fraud. Upon a trial by jury, judgment upon the verdict was entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendants for the sum of $15,500. The trial court thereafter denied defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and denied defendants’ motion to tax plaintiff’s costs. Defendants appeal from the judgment and from the orders denying said motions.
This litigation arose out of a transaction in which plaintiff acquired defendants’ apartment house in 1927. In her com plaint plaintiff alleged misrepresentation of the size of certain apartments, misrepresentation of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Lafargue v. United Railroad of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Oppenheimer v. ClunieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Kaston v. Nathan Zimmerman & George Orlove & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- MacDonald v. RoethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wills v. JJ Newberry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Sorenson v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Distefano v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Langan v. McCorkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Muller v. ReaghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960