Legal Opinion

Distefano v. Hall

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 1963No. Civ. 19502PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.

All of the parties to this litigation have appealed from the judgment in an action brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. In essence, there: are three ■ appeals * by plaintiff; by defendants Charles W.'Hall and Dorothea Fabian (hereinafter referred to as Hall); and by defendants Carl L. Dozier and Winifred Dozier (hereinafter referred to as Dozier).

Statement of the Case.

Plaintiff filed an action against Hall -and Dozier for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien upon certain real property. 1 The complaint alleges that plaintiff, as a licensed general contractor, entered into a written contract…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Eads v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Lysick v. WalcomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. North American Chemical Co. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Distefano v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Selby Constructors v. McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API