Distefano v. Hall
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.
All of the parties to this litigation have appealed from the judgment in an action brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. In essence, there: are three ■ appeals * by plaintiff; by defendants Charles W.'Hall and Dorothea Fabian (hereinafter referred to as Hall); and by defendants Carl L. Dozier and Winifred Dozier (hereinafter referred to as Dozier).
Statement of the Case.
Plaintiff filed an action against Hall -and Dozier for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien upon certain real property. 1 The complaint alleges that plaintiff, as a licensed general contractor, entered into a written contract…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Eads v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Lysick v. WalcomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- North American Chemical Co. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Distefano v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Selby Constructors v. McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.