Legal Opinion

Muller v. Reagh

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1960No. Civ. No. 18941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOOD, J. pro tem.*

The pertinent facts may be summarized as follows: On March 4, 1959, in the third day of a jury trial wherein plaintiff appeared in propria persona a colloquy occurred between him and the trial judge wherein he excepted to the suggestion that it might he better if he secured counsel and claimed the same as “prejudicial, prejudging, harmful, reversible, egregious error and misconduct. ” Defendant moved for a mistrial and the motion was granted. Two days thereafter, plaintiff moved the court for an order *815taxing costs to defendant. Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lacey v. BertoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Mullin v. RousseauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Muller v. HallenbeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API