Muller v. Reagh
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GOOD, J. pro tem.*
The pertinent facts may be summarized as follows: On March 4, 1959, in the third day of a jury trial wherein plaintiff appeared in propria persona a colloquy occurred between him and the trial judge wherein he excepted to the suggestion that it might he better if he secured counsel and claimed the same as “prejudicial, prejudging, harmful, reversible, egregious error and misconduct. ” Defendant moved for a mistrial and the motion was granted. Two days thereafter, plaintiff moved the court for an order *815taxing costs to defendant. Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lacey v. BertoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Mullin v. RousseauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
3Cited by2 opinions
- Muller v. HallenbeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962