Legal Opinion

Langan v. McCorkle

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1969No. Civ. 33967PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

for failure to bring it to trial within five years. (Code Civ. Proc., § 583.)

The pertinent chronology of the action:

1962

16 October — Langan filed an action for rescission or damages against McCorkle and others.

13 December — McCorkle answered.

1967

29 August — Langan filed an amended complaint naming additional parties defendant.

19 September —■ The court sustained demurrers of other defendants to the amended complaint and granted Langan leave to amend.

21 September — Langan filed a second amended complaint, which McCorkle did not answer.

6 October Langan entered McCorkle’s default.

11 October…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Christin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Gray v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Rosefield Packing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Superior Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Reeves v. HutsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brunzell Construction Co. v. WagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Hughes v. KimbleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Maguire v. CollierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Misic v. SegarsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. In Re Marriage of DunmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API