Legal Opinion

Castillo v. Franks

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1984No. 84-193PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

Jake and Myrle Franks appeal from a judgment against them entered in the District Court, Sixth Judicial District, Park County, in favor of the Castillos and the Cotants. With minor modifications, we affirm the judgment.

Issues raised by the Franks include these: (1) that the plaintiffs’ suits are barred by the statute of limitations; (2) that plaintiffs’ claims are barred by latches; (3) that the awards of punitive damages are in error; (4) that damages for loss of hay crops are improper; and (5) that the court erred in awarding prejudgment interest.

In 1976, Jake and Myrle Franks purchased 160…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. General Insurance Co. of America v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. Stensvad v. MINERS & MERCHANTS BANK, ETC.Montana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Nester v. Western Union Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1938
  4. Healy v. GinoffMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Quitmeyer v. TherouxMontana Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Montanans for Justice: Vote No on CI-98 Not in Montana: Citizens Against CI-97 & Property Owners Against I-154 v. State Ex Rel. McGrathMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Billings Clinic v. Peat Marwick Main & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Textana, Inc. v. Klabzuba Oil & GasMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. People ex rel. S.R.M.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Baltrusch v. BaltruschMontana Supreme Court · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API