Legal Opinion

Quitmeyer v. Theroux

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1964No. 10621PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Castles

This is an action for damages brought by plaintiffs, Y. E. Quitmeyer and Lois Quitmeyer, hereinafter referred to as respondents, against defendants Warren G. Theroux and Roy McLaren individually and as co-partners, who will hereinafter be referred to as appellants.

The jury’s verdict was for respondents. Judgment was entered. It is from this verdict and judgment that this appeal has been perfected.

The controversy in question arose from claimed improper *304performance of duties by appellants under an alleged oral agreement whereby appellants were to manage an apartment building owned by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Webber v. Herkimer & Mohawk Street RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Jackson v. Central Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Adami v. MurphyMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Stagg v. StaggMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Loehr v. East Side Omnibus Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. of Anchorage, Inc. v. Superior Burner Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Clark v. FiggeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  3. DCR INC. v. Peak Alarm Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Erickson v. CroftMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Dewey v. StringerMontana Supreme Court · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API