Legal Opinion

Billings Clinic v. Peat Marwick Main & Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1990No. 88-623PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

The Billings Clinic, a partnership of medical doctors in Billings, proposed in 1982 to liquidate a corporation under § 331 of the Federal Internal Revenue Code, and contemporaneously to build a larger office facility financed by the issuance of industrial revenue bonds complying with federal tax laws. The Clinic retained Peat Marwick Main and Company, a national firm of accountants with offices in Billings, for “tax and accounting considerations” relating to the Clinic’s plans. The critical issue here, among other important issues, is the outer extent of the professional duty owed to the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Randall v. LoftsgaardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Sato v. Van DenburghArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Tribby v. Northwestern Bank of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Thiel v. TAURUS DRILLING LTD. 1980-IIMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Massman v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Bruno, D., Aplts. v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Lee v. Lee, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  3. Bitterroot International Systems, Ltd. v. Western Star Trucks, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Tin Cup County Water v. Garden City Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Dewey v. StringerMontana Supreme Court · 2014

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API