Stensvad v. MINERS & MERCHANTS BANK, ETC.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy
Appeal is by Miners and Merchants Bank from a judgment rendered against it on Stensvad’s complaint in the District Court, Fourteenth Judicial District, Musselshell County. The bank had counterclaimed against Stensvad on unpaid promissory notes.
*196The District Court found that the bank had breached an agreement to finance Stensvad’s corporations and after that breach had converted or appropriated his property, resulting in damages to Stensvad of $1,631,047, plus lost profits in the sum of $511,695. The court granted a set-off of $1,750,234 as of January 31,1979 by reason of the indebtedness of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tri-Tron International, a Montana Corporation v. A. A. Velto and William Wurz, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Welch v. U. S. Bancorp Realty & Mortgage TrustOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Spackman v. Ralph M. Parsons Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1966
- Glantz v. GabelMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- Smith v. ZeppMontana Supreme Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Bottrell v. American BankMontana Supreme Court · 1989
- Bolz v. MyersMontana Supreme Court · 1982
- Ophus v. FritzMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BenoitMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- Sawyers v. FMA Leasing Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.