Legal Opinion

Baltrusch v. Baltrusch

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2003No. 01-503PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Otto Baltrusch, Jr. (Otto) appeals the judgment entered by the Twelfth Judicial District Court, Hill County, finding that all of the partnership property jointly owned by Otto and William Baltrusch (William) be liquidated, with the proceeds distributed equally between them.

¶2 We address the following issues on appeal and affirm:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in determining that Otto received a benefit from the payment of life insurance premiums when that issue was not included in the District Court’s final pretrial order?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err in determining that substantial…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Warnack v. Coneen Family TrustMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Kizer v. Semitool, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Tipp v. SkjelsetMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Castillo v. FranksMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Price Building Service, Inc. v. HolmsMontana Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Baltrusch v. BaltruschMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Emmerson v. WalkerMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. AVANTA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. ShupakMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. White v. LongleyMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. In Re the Marriage of FosterMontana Supreme Court · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API