Legal Opinion

Healy v. Ginoff

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1923No. 5,312PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Galen

In this case it appears that the defendants were desirous of making purchase of lands for agricultural purposes, and that the plaintiff through his agents, on September 16, 1916, induced them to contract for the purchase of certain land in Powell county, comprising 138 acres, said to have an adequate supply of water with which to irrigate the same. Defendants made purchase of such land, agreeing to pay therefor $6,200, $500 of which was paid in cash. The premises, together with a water right of 138 miner’s inches from the north fork of the Big Blackfoot River for irrigation and domestic…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lee v. Stockmen's National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Connelly Co. v. Schlueter Bros.Montana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Myers v. BenderMontana Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Harry Bechtel and Cathleen Bechtel, Husband and Wife v. Liberty National Bank, a National Banking AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  2. McGregor v. MommerMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Weitzel v. JukichIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Brown v. Homestake Exploration Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Exchange State Bank v. Occident Elevator Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API